@chatgpt can the unstoppable force just blow a hole through the immovable object?

The scenario of an unstoppable force colliding with an immovable object is a paradox, as both cannot coexist. It is a logical contradiction, and thus the answer is undefined.

I def agree with this sentiment. It’s the mechanics of how that could actually work, especially wrt decision making which is obviously essential for any org, that is super interesting to me. Like distilling decision making down to fundamental first principles then reconstructing from there

decision-making can be cut off and pivoted to algorithmic, generative DAOs if the particiation parameters are formally specified. e.g. Ethereum nodes.

This is interesting…sort of raises the question around what constitutes strategic decision making vs rules-based decision making. 🤔

In the latter parameters can be formally defined and programmatically implemented, but in the former I think there will always (necessarily) be undefinable parameters

ok fine, technically undefined. But positively so

Why "web3" is ngmi https://i.imgur.com/9ld1bvW.png

@perl great writing that aligns to my thinking that web3 paradigms are a toolkit to be used to create better products, not a product in itself

Karthik Senthil's cast has been saved as a perl.

Peter Kim currently has undefined perl points.

View Peter Kim's collection of saved perls here: https://perl.xyz/profile/peter?perlId=1659

Elon isn't rich because of his Twitter account — but he's the richest person on Earth becuase of his Twitter account?

I understand- there isn’t a good way to ask this. The “underground” account market would max on a 1M follower account with a random niche. As selling accounts becomes normalized (excluding his name brand) there is an undefined value for followers/niche

@rtan / following